Comments on: Interfaces, Abstact Classes and Base Classes, oh my! http://blog.palehorse.net/2007/10/25/interfaces-abstact-classes-and-base-classes-oh-my/ Thoughts from a mind twisted by tech and sports Thu, 27 Oct 2011 23:52:26 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: David Hogue http://blog.palehorse.net/2007/10/25/interfaces-abstact-classes-and-base-classes-oh-my/#comment-647 Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:50:45 +0000 http://blog.palehorse.net/2007/10/25/interfaces-abstact-classes-and-base-classes-oh-my/#comment-647 I think I use interfaces and plain old base classes more than abstract classes. Usually I’ll inherit from a base class and override a function to change it’s behavior. If I have multiple implementations a small interface often fits better for me.

And I don’t think I use inheritance nearly as much as the intro to object oriented stuff suggests. I try to do a lot more with composition of small objects.

]]> By: palehorse http://blog.palehorse.net/2007/10/25/interfaces-abstact-classes-and-base-classes-oh-my/#comment-644 Thu, 25 Oct 2007 23:09:38 +0000 http://blog.palehorse.net/2007/10/25/interfaces-abstact-classes-and-base-classes-oh-my/#comment-644 I agree on both counts. :D The article by Maor David was more of an informational whereas Mahesh’s was his opinion and reasoning for it. I like the information to help me make my own decisions.

]]> By: Dave Goodman http://blog.palehorse.net/2007/10/25/interfaces-abstact-classes-and-base-classes-oh-my/#comment-643 Thu, 25 Oct 2007 23:03:23 +0000 http://blog.palehorse.net/2007/10/25/interfaces-abstact-classes-and-base-classes-oh-my/#comment-643 Interesting articles. I preferred the one by Maor David. I wish they’d both been written in better English, though. :)

]]>